Notify Me

  1. Sign In
  2. If you want to receive text messages enter your phone number and select Save.
  3. To subscribe or unsubscribe click Email icon and/or SMS icon next to the lists to which you wish to subscribe/unsubscribe.
Sender Name:
Media Information Office
Sent By:
(Automatically Sent By Website)
Send Date:
12/17/2015 3:43:13 PM
Email Subject:
PRESS RELEASE - Malibu’s Measure R Invalidated by Superior Court

Formatted HTML message

For Immediate Release
December 17, 2015
Contact: Matt Myerhoff, Media Information Officer
(310) 456-2489 ext. 283
Email: mmyerhoff@malibucity.org


Malibu’s Measure R Invalidated by Superior Court

(Malibu, CA) – This week Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant invalidated Malibu’s Measure R, which was adopted by the voters to regulate commercial development and chain stores in Malibu.

“Although disappointing for the initiative proponents and Malibu voters, the decision has one very positive aspect that the City may use to salvage the objectives of Measure R,” said City Attorney Christi Hogin.

“While the court rejected the measure’s particular mechanism for regulating chain businesses, the court accepted the essential premise that chain stores are a different land use category than non-chain stores. The City may re-examine the formula retail ordinance that was superseded by Measure R and use the decision as a roadmap to enact future regulations.”

The Judge ruled that Measure R’s requirement that any proposed commercial or mixed-use project over 20,000 square feet be approved by a vote of the people, violates California law. Specifically, the court held that Measure R’s requirement of a specific plan – ordinarily a legislative act within the authority of the voters – was a contrivance to allow voters to approve or reject individual development projects, which is illegal.

Reading Measure R as a whole, Judge Chalfant concluded that, “Measure R is categorical in requiring a voter-approved specific plan for each new large-scale commercial development.” The court acknowledged that voters may adopt general plan amendments and specific plans, but held that, while initiative measures are not to be struck down lightly, Measure R’s voter approval and hearing requirements “cross the line into administrative, not legislative, function.”

Judge Chalfant also ruled that the measure’s requirement that individual chain stores obtain a conditional use permit violates state law because it applies to specific tenants, not to a general category of uses.

Measure R was overwhelmingly approved by the voters in November 2014, replacing the City’s chain store ordinance. The ruling also blocks the City from enforcing Measure R.

The complete ruling has been posted on the City’s website at www.malibucity.org/MeasureR.

###


Plain text message

For Immediate Release
December 17, 2015
Contact: Matt Myerhoff, Media Information Officer
(310) 456-2489 ext. 283
Email: mmyerhoff@malibucity.org [mailto:mmyerhoff@malibucity.org]


Malibu’s Measure R Invalidated by Superior Court

(Malibu, CA) – This week Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant invalidated Malibu’s Measure R, which was adopted by the voters to regulate commercial development and chain stores in Malibu.

“Although disappointing for the initiative proponents and Malibu voters, the decision has one very positive aspect that the City may use to salvage the objectives of Measure R,” said City Attorney Christi Hogin.

“While the court rejected the measure’s particular mechanism for regulating chain businesses, the court accepted the essential premise that chain stores are a different land use category than non-chain stores. The City may re-examine the formula retail ordinance that was superseded by Measure R and use the decision as a roadmap to enact future regulations.”

The Judge ruled that Measure R’s requirement that any proposed commercial or mixed-use project over 20,000 square feet be approved by a vote of the people, violates California law. Specifically, the court held that Measure R’s requirement of a specific plan – ordinarily a legislative act within the authority of the voters – was a contrivance to allow voters to approve or reject individual development projects, which is illegal.

Reading Measure R as a whole, Judge Chalfant concluded that, “Measure R is categorical in requiring a voter-approved specific plan for each new large-scale commercial development.” The court acknowledged that voters may adopt general plan amendments and specific plans, but held that, while initiative measures are not to be struck down lightly, Measure R’s voter approval and hearing requirements “cross the line into administrative, not legislative, function.”

Judge Chalfant also ruled that the measure’s requirement that individual chain stores obtain a conditional use permit violates state law because it applies to specific tenants, not to a general category of uses.

Measure R was overwhelmingly approved by the voters in November 2014, replacing the City’s chain store ordinance. The ruling also blocks the City from enforcing Measure R.

The complete ruling has been posted on the City’s website at www.malibucity.org/MeasureR [/MeasureR] .

###

SMS message

PRESS RELEASE - Malibu’s Measure R Invalidated by Superior Court